2005-10-22
Pallywood, "According to Palestinian Sources..." a film by Richard Landes. International news media extract a few convincing instants of staged scenes - sight-bytes, and present them as news
www.seconddraft.org/ home.php
For film:
www.seconddraft.org/ streaming/pallywood.wmv
www.seconddraft.org/ movies/pallywood.divx
The material we show here constitutes a tiny fragment of a much larger phenomenon, raw footage from Palestinian photographers working for major western media outlets.
From this material, our news agencies prepare news reports that shape our perceptions of what is happening in the Middle East Conflict.
We think that a close analysis of this material defies all expectations of what such footage should resemble, and suggest that Palestinian photographers do not at all share the same production and journalistic values espoused by a free press. We leave the experience and the judgment to you:
What we present you here is raw material, and we invite you to help us analyze it.
We provide you with site maps, and we have broken the material down into manageable and coherent segments, by the position of the cameraman. What you see here are the "rushes" taken by a Palestinian cameraman working with the equipment of, and for, a major western media outlet. This represents the second day of "rioting" in the territories, since Sharon's visit to the Temple Mount. During that day, according to witnesses on both sides, the Israelis never left their compound (see map). At the end of the day, firing broke out, and the Palestinians claimed five dead and many wounded. In the Western press, this day appears as the beginning of the "Second Intifada," the day both the West Bank and Gaza exploded in rage and violence against Israel.
The material is not easy to interpret. We therefore offer you three approaches:
In all cases, people who have the ability to go back and see the original material we have taken our excerpts from. Then they are welcome to join the larger discussion of what this tells us about our media right now.
In any case, these rushes demand from us a CSI approach, the kind of approach a historian, or a forensic expert might employ. For those looking at the raw material, we recommend that you view it a number of times, with certain issues in mind:
Then go back and look at the action figures, the wounded, those who evacuate, the ambulance drivers, the cameramen:
We invite your comment on all aspects of the dossier, from the details of in what sequence the segments were taken (how to judge the time of day), to who the key players are, and we provide forums for these discussions.
But the dossier suggests far more than what it specifically shows us about September 30, and raises larger questions to which we invite all of you, no matter how you've entered into the subject matter, to comment upon:
We feel that the material you are about to see bears witness to a failure of our MSM culture comparable to that of the Emperor and his court when he paraded naked in front of his public. Moreover, that error is kept from us only by our media's refusal to let the public see their sources. Only the chance circumstances that brought this material to a few people's attention, and the existence of an open internet where we can post the material, makes it possible for the public to consider this costly media embarrassment. The consequences have been and continue to be detrimental to all involved - Palestinians, Israelis, all the people around the world who wish to see peace come to this troubled area and wish for the great encounter between the people's of the world that now takes place to happen in peace and mutual respect.
236 Seiten, Paperback, 2011. (Presseinfo)
16.50 € bei Amazon